Mastodon Pallimed: artificial nutrition
Showing posts with label artificial nutrition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label artificial nutrition. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

The Not-Quite Annual ASCO Round-Up - 2018 edition

by Drew Rosielle

The American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, besides being a feast for the pharmaceutical business news pages (google 'ASCO' and most of the hits will be about how announcement X affected drug company Y's stock), is also one of the premiere platforms for publishing original palliative-oncology research. So every year I try to at least scan the abstracts to see what's happening, and I figure I might as well blog about it. It's tough to analyze abstracts, so I'll mostly just be summarizing ones that I think will be of interest to hospice and palliative care folks. I imagine I've missed some good ones, please leave a link in the comments if I have! My major observations on this year's abstracts is that there was very little about symptom management compared to years past, except for neuropathies.

(Past ASCO reviews here - 2008, 2017 - Ed.)

Fatigue/Nutrition
Communication
Pain and Symptoms
Systems Issues
  • Claims and SEER database study suggesting that earlier palliative care involvement in pancreatic cancer reduces some costs. 
  • Patients in Medicare managed care organizations use hospice a little more than fee for service Medicare patients 
  • Barriers to palliative care involvement in patients receiving stem cell transplants, including this data point, which is something I've personally wondered about a lot: "Higher sense of ownership over patients’ PC issues (β = -0.36, P < 0.001) was associated with a more negative attitude towards PC [by hematologists]."  
  • EOL spending was higher in ACO patients vs non-ACO patients.  
  • A retrospective study which compares many outcomes in patients who receive early palliative care inpatient vs not. The title abstract highlights survival (which was a bit longer in the palliative group). Please do not quote this abstract however to claim that PC prolongs survival in patients with cancer: this is messy retrospective data, and it's not even clear from the abstract whether the survival difference was in univariate or multivariate analysis (PC patients, eg, were younger, more likely to be discharged home, etc.). Similarly, a Canadian study looked at early palliative care consultation in pancreatic cancer (retrospectively) and apparently showed that late but not early palliative consultation was associated with longer survival. The same study also showed that having metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis was also associated with longer survival, so I'm not going to make much of any of this.

Drew Rosielle, MD is a palliative care physician at the University of Minnesota Health in Minnesota. He founded Pallimed in 2005. You can occasionally find him on Twitter at @drosielle. For more Pallimed posts by Drew click here.

Wednesday, June 6, 2018 by Drew Rosielle MD ·

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

When Surrogates Disagree on Care & Treatment



 by Vikranta Sharma MD

Leela* was a 93-year-old female who had lived a long, happy and fulfilled life. She had been married to the love of her life for 55 years, had 3 children and many grand children. She had a long and satisfying career in health care and was very sure of her wishes about death and dying till she developed progressive Alzheimer’s dementia which became very advanced by age 93. She lived at home with her daughter Jennie, her caregiver and power of attorney for past 3 years. Unfortunately Jennie herself was recovering from a stroke she suffered last year. It left her with expressive aphasia and inability to drive. 

Her grand daughter Sue was the new caregiver for both of them for the past 12 months.

Leela was declining, she had developed difficulty swallowing due to the progressive neuromuscular weakness that comes with advanced Alzheimer’s dementia, she needed full assistance in bathing, toileting dressing as well as feeding, her speech sparse and meaningless. Essentially, she was bed bound. She lay curled up in a fetal position most of the time. Recently she had started spitting out the pills that were put in her mouth and refused to be fed.


She was admitted with a second bout of aspiration pneumonia and altered sensorium. She was treated with antibiotics and hydrated briefly, without any significant improvement in her functional ability. She could barely open her eyes to command and then quietly close them again.

When asked about her wishes, Sue told me that her grandma was a registered nurse and never wanted to have tube feeds and wished to go naturally without tubes or heroic efforts when the time came. She had seen too many people suffer with unnecessary care. Jennie nodded in agreement and she and I signed the POLST form that makes these wishes an order.  There was hushed mention of a distant son who had not seen her in the past few years, but Jennie said she would inform him as well. Leela started home hospice after obtaining consents from the daughter.

When Surrogates Disagree
Two weeks later, an angry son called hospice and asked his mother to be taken off the hospice, he called 911 and demanded her to be taken to ER, he wanted her hydrated, treated with antibiotics and possibly started on PEG tube feeds, as he felt that this amounted to starving her.
He still wanted no CPR or intubation, but did not agree with hospice philosophy.

The patient was taken off hospice and after several family meetings a PEG tube was placed and she was accepted in a nursing home. Medicare would now pay for her room and board due to the newly placed G tube.

Decisions Undone
In America, surrogates often override the decision of an incapacitated relative, regarding end of life care. Various reasons involved include religious beliefs, personality conflicts, misunderstandings and financial reasons.

POLST is meant to be a legal document to help convert a patients known wishes into physician orders. However, families make decision collectively and may influence the behavior of the surrogate.  Sometimes that decision may go against the wishes of the patient.

The Faults in our System
It is an outrage that  our healthcare system pays for doing more to the patient than doing something for the patient that the patient actually wished for! Medicare will not cover the stay of a dying patient in a nursing home but will cover the stay if they have a procedure  like PEG tube that automatically qualifies them for a hundred days in the nursing home.
 
Leela passed away few months after PEG tube feeds were started, she developed diarrhea after being in the nursing home, where she died with decubitus ulcers and sepsis finally. At least she didn't die hungry.

*Names and details have been changed to protect the privacy of patients and family.
Vikranta Sharma is a hospice medical director at the Visiting Nurse Association Health Group in New Jersey.  

Join us this week on Wednesday, 9pm EST, 6pm PST for #hpm chat for a discussion on this topic and more!

What: #hpm (hospice and palliative med/care) chat on Twitter
When: Wed 3/16/2016 - 9p ET/ 6p PT
Host: Vikranta Sharma MD Follow her on Twitter


If you are new to Tweetchats, you do not need a Twitter account to follow along. Try using the search function on Twitter. If you do have a Twitter account, we recommend using tchat.io for ease of following. You can also check out the new site dedicated to #hpm chat - www.hpmchat.org / @hpmchat
 
 

Tuesday, March 15, 2016 by Niamh van Meines ·

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Most Days I Clamor for POLST

Helen Kao at Geripal recently wrote a thoughtful post which highlights some of the flaws in the California POLST form. It's worth a read and I agree with her comments.  (And even though I use "POLST" here, I agree with her thoughts on using "POST" instead.)

For jurisdictions which are considering the establishment of POLST, it is important to consider the experience of other states as new forms are designed and legislation is drafted. I live in one of the many states which is in the process of developing a program. In spite of the weaknesses of forms currently in use in other places, PO(L)ST/MO(L)ST remains a very helpful tool with new research continuing to back its utility.  For instance, consider a recent study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society which demonstrated high consistency between treatments provided to nursing facility residents and orders recorded on POLST forms. The study found that overall, POLST orders were consistent with treatments provided 94% of the time. Consistency rates were especially high for resuscitation orders. Consistency rates were slightly lower for antibiotic use and much more modest for feeding tubes use. 

Reasons for inconsistencies between orders and treatments should be evaluated further.  It's unclear that improving the form itself would reduce these inconsistencies.  Patients' preferences sometimes change and sometimes patients want their surrogate to have the leeway to change orders after the patient loses capacity (perhaps using a "best interest" standard of decision-making at that time rather than a pure "substituted judgment" standard). 

I hope that my state will "get it right the first time" taking into account the experiences of others. However I know that it is impossible to get it completely right the first time. Therefore, I hope that any legislation approved will include a process for modification of the forms which does not require the wheel to be reinvented down the road.

Sunday, October 30, 2011 by Lyle Fettig ·

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Tube ‘em & Move ‘em: The Data Set

Greetings. This is my first guest-post on Pallimed; I’m hoping it won’t be my last. I had envisioned a cleverer debut, elucidating my inclination to HPM vis-à-vis my bio, as a non-traditional (read mid-life-crisis-old) entrant to medicine, and my specialty (PMR by way of EM). However, Drew is taking a hiatus and the article I’m posting on now fell into my lap while still printing-press warm. So, thanks to Drew, Christian and to the entire Pallimed Editorial Board for the encouragement and invitation. On to Pallimed…

Drew just posted 'It just changes the complications' covering an ethnographic study that appeared in the Archives of Internal Medicine about the influence of nursing home (NH) culture on rates of tube feeding of patients with advanced dementia. My thoughts upon reading this (and I’ll wager I wasn’t alone) was that the information and the differences noted made sense to me, but it’s tough to make institutional and policy review and implement indicated changes based on ethnography.

So, as if in telepathic response to Pallimed readers, the current issue of JAMA contains an article about just this topic, abounding in hard data. Teno et al. 2010. Hospital Characteristics Associated With Feeding Tube Placement in Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Cognitive Impairment. JAMA. 303(6):544-550. The good people at GeriPal have also posted on this article.

This is a large, retrospective, chart-review covering the 8-year period from 2000 through 2007. It has a Texas-sized data set, N = 280,869 admissions for 163,022 residents of nursing homes with advanced cognitive impairment. The U.S. Nursing Home Minimum Data Set defined the study population. The resultant random sample size represented 20% of all Medicare beneficiaries who were previously non-tube fed NH residents age ≥66, admitted to 2797 out of 5401 U.S. hospitals during the study period.

The rates of endoscopic or surgical insertion of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement during a hospitalization varied from 0 to 38.9 per 100 admissions (mean 6.5, median 5.3).

Encouragingly, the practice showed a decrease over time. The mean rate of feeding tube insertions per 100 admissions was 7.9 in 2000, decreasing to 6.2 in 2007, with the biggest decrease occurring in 2005.

I feared certain ugly truths possibly emerging that perhaps patients’ best interests would be sacrificed for medical student or resident training; or that hospitals with high specialist-to-PCP ratio would nudge patients down an unfortunate path. These fears of mine were not borne out by the data.

Hospital characteristics that did emerge as risk factors for G-tube placement in NH residents with advanced cognitive impairment were in order of decreasing adjusted odds ratios:
  • Greater ICU use in the last 6 months of life
  • Larger size, and
  • For-profit ownership vs government ownership
These differences persisted after controlling for patient characteristics. I think these represent at least unfortunate truths. To me there is a certain Kafkaesque darkness to the notion that admission to a large, for-profit hospital with high ICU use in the last 6 months of life results in significantly higher rates of G-tube placement in NH residents with advanced dementia.

Several nursing home resident characteristics were independently associated with G-tube placement. Black NH residents with severe dementia had about a 2-fold increased likelihood of having a G-tube placed; white residents had the lowest likelihood of G-tube placement.

Patient characteristics that reduced the likelihood of G-tube placement were having written advance directives, DNR orders, and orders to forgo artificial hydration.

Hospice use was weakly or not associated with feeding tube placement. This last factoid was perplexing to me. It led me to consider if this incongruity was a function of the heterogeneity and evolution of HPM practice models and styles over geography and time, e.g., placing venting G-tube placement for anticipated GI obstruction, or ex post facto, late hospice referrals.

Hypotheses anyone?
ResearchBlogging.org
Teno JM, Mitchell SL, Gozalo PL, Dosa D, Hsu A, Intrator O, & Mor V (2010). Hospital characteristics associated with feeding tube placement in nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 303 (6), 544-50 PMID: 20145231

Thursday, February 11, 2010 by Brian McMichael, M.D. ·

Pallimed | Blogger Template adapted from Mash2 by Bloggermint