Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Sertraline is not good for what ails you; Palliative care & ALS

1)
Lancet Oncology has a couple of articles to note:

First is a randomized controlled trial of sertraline in advanced cancer patients suggesting it's not good for what ails you. This was a randomized, placebo controlled trial of 189 patients with advanced cancer who weren't feeling great (had some symptoms of depression, fatigue, anxiety, etc.) but who weren't felt to be actually depressed. What was meant by that last phrase - it's a little tricky - the patients had to score 4/10 on scales of self reported depression, anxiety, or fatigue - but who didn't have 'major depression' by the assessment of the 'responsible' clinician. That is, the patients weren't formally assessed for major depression, meaning that probably some of them indeed had major depression given how depression is notoriously under-diagnosed in cancer patients (on the other hand this does replicate 'real life' insofar as these weren't patients the treating clinician would have likely treated anyway). Patients were given 50mg of sertraline or placebo and primary analyses were at 4 & 8 weeks (although it seems patients were followed longer). Numerous assessment scales were employed.

Most patients were over 60 and had ECOG scores of 1. Sertraline did not come out looking good: basically no benefit on any of the many measures they took of depressive symptoms, fatigue, quality of life, etc.; it was discontinued earlier and more often than placebo due to adverse effects; and the study was actually stopped early because it looked like the sertraline patients had higher mortality than placebo (this wasn't significant in the final analysis however and was probably a statistical event and not a clinical one).

Prior to seeing this study I hadn't been aware people had been suggesting SSRI's for advanced cancer patients without a clear indication for them as a "quality of life booster" or a preventive measure against future depression and this study will likely squelch further investigation of this. I wonder though if further investigation is needed and that's to see if sertraline is effective for at all 'true' major depression in advanced cancer patients particularly given than some of these patients certainly had major depression and pretty much all of them had depressive symptoms. This, I think, is the true implication of this study. I would need to do a literature review here, and maybe a reader could help out, but my impression was that there are a handful of quality studies looking at antidepressants in cancer that were generally positive. What I'm unsure of is how many of these studies were of advanced cancer patients as that may make a world of difference.

I'll also briefly mention a trial of radium-223 in hormone-refractory prostate cancer with painful bone mets. Radium-223 is beginning to be studied in humans as a novel radionucleotide (similar to strontium or samarium) and this was a phase II study in which it (or placebo injection) was given to patients undergoing concurrent external beam radiation. It only involved ~60 patients and the main outcomes were tolerability (it was well tolerated) and markers of bone turnover (alkaline phosphatase). Tantalizingly their results suggested an antineoplastic effect of the radium (slowed down PSA rise and the patients who received it lived longer) although the study wasn't really designed or powered to show this. Pain/analgesia and quality of life weren't measured at all. One assumes that these will be looked at in phase III trials and I hope these outcomes don't get lost as people get excited over this as an antineoplastic agent.

2)
JAMA has a couple pieces recently as well.

First is a another installment of JAMA's 'perspectives on care at the close of life' series - this one on palliative care for patients with ALS. Like the rest of the series it is a comprehensive review based around a case and patient/family/clinician interviews. One of the most interesting aspects of the article to me was its discussion of tracheostomy and long term mechanical ventilation and that there's some evidence to suggest that many patients who receive this do so under emergency circumstances and without their explicit consent. Yikes.

Last is a 'coda' to their recent one on management of fatigue at the close of life. I really appreciated these lines. This is July, the time when fresh palliative care fellows are starting their training, and understanding this perspective is key to their education:

"I am deeply humbled by my experience in caring for Mrs D. She taught me much about balancing "cure" and "care" in patients facing chronic and progressive illness. She reminded me that the challenge of providing genuine "patient-centered" care—care is fundamentally grounded in a patient's goals and preferences—especially within the context of great uncertainty.

Mrs D also taught me much about managing fatigue in elderly persons with progressive illness. Although I seemed to achieve temporary success with treatments like antidepressants, exercise, and appetite stimulants, I truly believe my most important intervention was a willingness and commitment to listen to her frustrations, fears, and hopes around this troubling and refractory symptom. My treatment attempts, regardless of their efficacy, seemed to at least validate her illness experience."

5 Responses to “Sertraline is not good for what ails you; Palliative care & ALS”

Christian Sinclair, MD said...
July 17, 2007

I like your use of the phrase "quality of life booster." Depression and end of life issues seem to get lumped together so easily, that SSRI's may often get started just for that reason, when a good clinical evaluation for depression may be required. It is important to draw on all the social resources that may be available to oncologists, and palliative care providers including social workers, chaplains, psychiatrists, psychologists, expressive therapies (art, music, and others). And then come up with a cohesive plan to address the multifactorial casues of depressive symptoms. Meds are not always the trick, but too often are they used in isolation.

I would love to see a raise of hands of how many physicians have ever prescribed or been involved with a patient who is actively receiving a radionucleotide. It may just be my geographical locations, or something else, but for as much as I read about radionucleotides in articles/textbooks, I have yet to see them used clinically. Anybody else feel this way? If not, tell me why I should be seeing/using them more.

Nice Coda.


Drew Rosielle MD said...
July 18, 2007

While I agree with your first paragraph - drawing on all the resources - the question is how much benefit does that provide our advanced cancer patients? Doing things, many things, doesn't mean we're helping....

Radionucleotide therapies are used at my institution for sure. Rarely, but that's because the indication for them seems relatively tight: multiple painful sites not feasibly or safely treated with external beam radiation. The research supporting them is relatively solid though. If radium turns out to be an effective antitumor/life prolonging therapy in hormone refractory prostate cancer we may be seeing much more of these.


Drew Rosielle MD said...
July 19, 2007

In response to my querying about good data supporting antidepressant use in advanced cancer Dr. Bob Arnold asked one of his librarians to kindly run a search on this which he forwarded to me. My gloss: there aren't a lot of good data supporting SSRI use. As far as controlled trials go it looks like there have been 2 specifically evaluating fluoxetine in advanced cancer & both of these support its use. (cut & paste these into your browser address window if you want the link).

http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/21/10/1937

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9741068

There have been a couple other trials which included advanced cancer patients which were negative (didn't support antidepressant use).

There has been a recent systematic review of depression treatment in cancer which includes these two articles also. I blogged about it briefly here: http://www.pallimed.org/2006/11/advanced-directives-in-ny-times.html

And here is the original link: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/520/2007/00000015/00000002/00000145

Anyway it seems the issues are multifold:
1) a lack of controlled trials in general.
2) a particular lack of controlled trials in advanced cancer patients
3) non-uniformity in definitions of advanced cancer patients, but this plagues a lot of cancer research
4) what evidence there is supports fluoexetine - it's unclear whether we can assume there is a 'class effect' here - whether we can generalize from fluoxetine to all SSRI's (like sertraline). on the one hand they are in fact all different agents, with different pharmacokinetics, and receptor affinities etc. on the other hand in depression in otherwise healthy adults they all seem equally efficacious (supporting a true class effect). someone tell me if this is wrong. it's reasonable to assume that depression in advanced cancer is different from depression in healthy adults.

So that's where things stand. None of this is to say we shouldn't be trying these drugs, we really don't know, and like most other things in palliative medicine sometimes they seem to help but often they don't. That, at least, is my experience.

Curious what others' thoughts are.

Anyway, Bob, thanks for the info.


Christian Sinclair, MD said...
July 19, 2007

Here are the links from Drew's Post above with hyperlink

Number 1

Number 2

Number 3

Number 4


Drew Rosielle MD said...
July 20, 2007

Props also to Charles Wessel a librarian at Pitt who did this for Dr. Arnold and who provided two further systematic reviews on the subject:

One in Palliative Medicine

One in Br J CA

Note that neither of the 3 systematic reviews mentioned are specifically about advanced cancer and what there is about advanced cancer is mentioned in prior comments.

Thanks again Bob & Charles.