Saturday, February 28, 2015
As David Currow said when he received his Excellence in Research award, hospice and palliative medicine researchers need to meticulously measure toxicity in addition to benefits of palliative interventions. How do you think the State of the Science studies did with this goal? What do you think about the conclusions of each of the studies? Any changes in your practice? Thanks to the presenters Jay Horton, Kimberly Johnson,Nick Dionne-Odom, and Cardinale Smith for reviewing and presenting. Always a fun presentation.
Saturday, February 28, 2015 by Lyle Fettig, MD ·
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
By Katherine Sleeman
On Thursday 26th February from 9-10pm UK time (4pm New York, 8am 27th Sydney) we will be holding the monthly Twitter Journal Club for hospice and palliative medicine: #hpmjc. The aim of the journal club is to provide an informal multidisciplinary forum for discussion of latest research findings, and we hope you will join us. You can find some more information about the journal club here.
The paper for discussion this month is 'An integrated palliative and respiratory care service for patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness: a randomised controlled trial’. The paper was published in December 2014 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, and is open access.
This month’s journal club will be led by Katherine Sleeman (@kesleeman), Clinical Lecturer at the Cicely Saunders Institute.
Why this paper?
Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom in advanced diseases such as lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure, and is often difficult to manage.
This paper reports the results of a randomised controlled trial of an early integrated breathlessness support service for patients with refractory breathlessness (breathlessness that persists once treatment of the underlying disease is optimised). The breathlessness support service was a multi-professional integrated service combining respiratory, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and palliative care.
What did they find?
105 patients were randomly assigned over 2 years to receive either the breathlessness support service or usual care. The primary outcome was breathlessness mastery at 6 weeks after randomisation. The authors found that breathlessness mastery improved in the intervention group compared with the control group. Intriguingly, they also found that survival at 6 months was better in the breathlessness support service group than the control group.
Questions for discussion:
In your experience, is unrelieved breathlessness is a significant clinical problem?
What are the advantages of a fast track trial in palliative care?
What do you think of the primary endpoint of ‘breathlessness mastery’?
Are you surprised by the improved survival in the intervention arm? What might be the mechanism?
Are randomised controlled trials of palliative care that have patient survival as the primary endpoint needed?
We look forward to discussing this on 26 February, and hope that you can join us. Just follow @hpmjc and use #hpmJC on Twitter.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015 by Christian Sinclair ·
by Pallimed Editor ·
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Ah, the problem I am constantly faced with! Whether aged or not, so many near-dying people are still waiting to make a plan. Still no closer now, in their eighties, to recognizing that the deep mystery of death is just around the corner, and they haven’t really talked about what they want, as they are dying- the where, what, how of it is not even considered. Where, if you ask most people, is in their home, what and how of it is usually wanting a quick and painless death, avoiding suffering as much as possible, with the ability to say goodbye, and I love you to family. Many have not completed an advanced directive or a POLST, and have hardly scratched the surface of a real conversation.
We are deluged with articles and reports about having “the conversation”, and the recent "Being Mortal" Frontline special highlighted, again, what those of us working in hospice and palliative care are experiencing almost daily. The conversations are difficult. They are fraught with emotions, awaiting the abyss of grief when patients and families realize truths of the disease progression. The spouse hears that it is time for hospice, and is overcome. Not a comfortable moment for the doctor, but she is able to quietly sit while the harsh truth sinks in. Yes, the patient has been dying, incrementally, but now in earnest. Time is of the essence for the patient and family. And the medical team must be human, not cloaked in the protection of white coats and emotional detachment. It is not the time to whitewash the conversation in vagueness or unrealistic expectations: honesty with compassion is needed. “When words are both true and kind, they can change our world” (Buddha).
We all were born with the disease of mortality. And yes, “there’s no natural moment to have these conversations except when a crisis comes, and that’s too late”(Gawande). But for a grandfather who is reaching the end of his life, it can be a defining moment to talk to his young grandson; that just as the animals in the farm die, the grass and trees in the field die, so in the web of life, we all are dying, and he will be dead, soon, too.
There are so many moments to grasp, if we are conscious of them, to sit quietly and share the experience of being mortal.
Amy Getter is a palliative care and hospice nurse who cares for patients with life limiting illnesses. She lives on the Oregon coast and is passionate about her family, being surrounded by natural beauty, and telling stories.http://hospicediary.com/
Tuesday, February 24, 2015 by Pallimed Editor ·
We have come a long way from 2009 when we first had a score of people live tweeting the Annual Assembly. Whether you are here in Philadelphia or back home keeping the service running while your peers are here, it is easier than ever to get interact with all the great people who care about our field.
If you are looking for just the highlights, look no further than Twitter. You do not even need to have a Twitter account to make good use of the hashtag #hpm15 (but it sure helps!). Just go to twitter.com and enter #hpm15 in the search box and you will find the top tweets, pictures and info about the meeting. If you ever feel you just don't get Twitter, go read Staci Mandrola's post from Monday about how she finally gets it, after 5 years of reluctance. This week is a great opportunity to see what the potential of Twitter as an organizing tool for disseminating goo information. And after the conference you can join us for #hpm chat on Wednesday nights!
This year we are trying an experiment which may appeal to those of you who are more Facebook friendly than Twitter terrific. If you go to the Pallimed Facebook page (which is a really fun place to be BTW), and click on Events you will find the AAHPM/HPNA Annual Assembly listed. Here you can post about a session you went to and in the comments below that post, you can start conversations with people who went to that session, or who are interested in the topic. If it becomes popular, we will take what we learn and share it with AAHPM and HPNA and think about doing this in the future officially.
Now some of you may be thinking this social media stuff is for the birds, yet you may be feverishly writing notes to bring back to your colleagues back home. If you do a write-up of the big lessons you learned, consider sharing it more broadly. We would love to see what you wrote and we may publish the best ones we see here on Pallimed!
And lastly, if you are in Philly, please consider coming to the Annual Pallimed/Geripal party Thursday night and meet some of the writers of the websites. It has always been a great night. If you see any of us during the Assembly, please come up and say hello and get your Pallimed sticker for your badge.
Christian Sinclair, MD, FAAHPM is a palliative care doctor at the University of Kansas, editor of Pallimed and a fan of Philly cheese steaks and hoagies.
by Christian Sinclair ·
Monday, February 23, 2015
I met Joe Rotella, the newly announced CMO of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, in the grocery store yesterday. We were both browsing the aisles, him for some crackers, me for some chicken broth. We stopped for a chat. He mentioned he just joined Twitter (@JRotellaAAHPM) and he’s following my husband John (@drjohnm) and me (@drstacim).
We talked about how Twitter is a whole new world for newbie 50-year-olds. How hard it is to type a URL into that little box and make it short rather than embarrassingly long. How no one cares what we think. What is a TweetDeck and how do I get one? What’s the difference between RT and MT?
John has been on Twitter for almost five years. He started with a postage stamp size following of less than one hundred people. He now has over 10,000 people that resonate with his message of common sense care for atrial fibrillation that includes a huge dose of Vitamin L (lifestyle), in addition to pharmacologic therapy and catheter ablation.
I’ve been on Twitter for 2 weeks and have my own postage stamp following. I have no illusions that the stamp will morph into a real country. It is a second full time job for John and he loves it. What I do hope is that it will lead to more virtual grocery store chats with really cool people who love palliative care.
This is a small sample of the people I’ve met in two weeks! Christian Sinclair (@ctsinclair) who is a tireless social media advocate for palliative care and editor of Pallimed blog. Nora Zamichow (@zamichow) who wrote about how her husband died of brain cancer and never heard the words “You are dying”. Lizzy Miles (@LizzyMiles_MSW) who taught me 10 things I need to do when I get diagnosed with a serious illness. Lyle Fettig (@lfettig) who taught me to examine my own feelings of blame when caring for a person with a devastating and unfair diagnosis. Laurie Becklund (@exlatimes) who died of metastatic breast cancer on February 8th and says:
Promise me, I told my friends and family, that you'll never say that I died after “fighting a courageous battle with breast cancer.” This tired, trite line dishonors the dead and the dying by suggesting that we, the victims, are responsible for our deaths or that the fight we were in was ever fair.I could go on about all the good stuff on Twitter. Next week is our annual American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association meeting in Philadelphia. There will be thousands of the best, brightest, most committed, motivated, fearless palliative care people in the world at that meeting. And you are one of them! Join Twitter and join us at #HPM15 to get the word out about giving great care to people with serious illness.
You never know who you might chat with in the grocery store! Maybe the new CMO of AAHPM!
Staci Mandrola is a wife, mother, grandmother and palliative medicine physician who practices in Louisville, KY. Her husband John writes at Dr John M.
Monday, February 23, 2015 by Pallimed Editor ·
Friday, February 20, 2015
Lizzy Miles, MA, MSW is a hospice social worker in Columbus, Ohio best known for bringing the Death Cafe concept to the United States. You can follow her on Twitter here.
Image credit: "PLAN AHEAd" by Christian Sinclair for Palilmed, may use with attribtuion
Friday, February 20, 2015 by Lizzy Miles ·
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
by Kristina Newport, MD
We’ve all heard the multiple reasons why folks are not interested in using opioids for their symptoms…
“They gave my sister morphine and she died the next day”
“He associates that medicine with the war”
“My neighbor’s cousin’s brother was addicted to that stuff”
Lately I have been struck by, not only patient specific stories, but local and national stories about opioids that lead to further stigmatization. One that really stood out recently was a story about a prisoner who survived for 2 hours after initiation of the lethal injection procedure. Of course, this raises issues regarding the death penalty etc., but what I’d like to point out is that the drugs utilized drugs were midazolam and hydromorphone. The exact same medications that I ordered this morning for a patient in our hospice unit for refractory symptoms. I cringed when I heard the broadcaster name drugs that have so many beneficial uses, knowing that some of our future patients will hear this story and be jaded by it.
Locally and nationally, opioid dependence is in the news regularly, declaring prescription opioid abuse at an all time high, with frequency of overdose deaths tripling in the past 25 years.
Our anecdotal patient stories are supported by numerous published studies revealing patients’ main concerns of:
- fear of tolerance/addiction
- perceived hastening of death
- impairment of cognitive functioning
- “I am going prescribe the same drugs that were used to intentionally kill someone in Arizona, but I’m definitely not trying to kill your loved one”
- “2.1 million other people are addicted to this medication, but don’t worry about that at all… you’ll die before that becomes a problem.”
We do need to keep in mind, however, that our reasoning does not always speak to what is most important to our patients. Sometimes the above issues are not just passing thoughts, but strongly held beliefs. It is our duty to understand these beliefs, just as we need to understand beliefs about other treatments/end of life preferences. And in some cases, it’s best not to use opioids. While we profess that our goal is to meet the person where they are, we are sometimes as guilty as other specialties- offering the tools that we know and love, even if it is not what the patient wants for him or herself.
So when we hear a line like “There’s no way that I’m taking that evil medicine”, it’s important to pause and ask, Why?
Kristina Newport MD (@kbnewport) practices Hospice and Palliative Medicine in Lancaster, PA where she also spends time running after her children, 4 and 6.
Morphine Roche, leaflet cover, 1937 by Atelier Levitt-Him
"MorphineAdvertisement1900 - no watermark" by Venturist. Licensed under PD-US via Wikipedia.
Wednesday, February 18, 2015 by Kristina Newport ·
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
One of the challenges is recognizing and treating opioid induced neurotoxicity (OIN). Timely detection and treatment of OIN will prevent unnecessary opioid dose escalation and consequent adverse effects which may include delirium, myoclonus, excessive sedation, hyperalgesia, and even death. The treatment of OIN is typically identifying and treating the trigger in certain cases along with either opioid dose reduction and/or opioid rotation2-4. Without adequate knowledge of opioid rotation ratios among different opioids, there is a risk for overdosing or uncontrolled pain5.
One such opioid which is frequently the opioid of choice for rotation to is methadone. Methadone is one of the most common opioids used in the treatment of cancer related pain. Prescribing methadone safely involves the knowledge of its metabolism, adverse effects, drug interactions, and also its mechanism of action at various receptor sites in addition to being familiar with the process (one day vs. 3 day switch) of opioid rotation to methadone6-8. A recent study found that 30% of cancer outpatients undergo opioid rotation and almost all cancer patients on opioids visiting a supportive care center will undergo opioid titration. As a consequence of opioid rotations and titrations, our patients may possess several unused or expired opioids. It is reported that 75% of prescription opioid abusers obtain the drug from their family or friends.9 Unsafe practices of storing or using the opioids may lead to increased availability of these drugs for others to misuse10. As clinicians prescribing opioids, it is our duty to educate patients about locking their pain medication, disposing off unused medications safely, and strictly not sharing them with others.
When: Wed 1/7/2015 - 9p ET/ 6p PT
Host: Akhila Reddy, MD Follow @ReddysuppcareGraniteDoc
Facebook Event Listing: https://www.facebook.com/events/1410808352553443/
If you are new to Tweetchats, you do not need a Twitter account to follow along. Try using the search function on Twitter. If you do have a Twitter account, we recommend using nurph.com, for ease of following.
We will be posting the transcript and analytics here after the chat takes place. Chat Transcript and Chat Analytics courtesy of @Symplur
Tuesday, February 17, 2015 by Pallimed Editor ·
Monday, February 16, 2015
by Lyle Fettig, MD
You meet a 29 year old man with a history of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.* Palliative care was consulted after he presented to the hospital with lower extremity weakness and was found to have extensive new epidural spread of his disease as well as progression of disease in his chest and abdomen. He was just diagnosed five months ago. He started chemotherapy with hopes that he'd respond well enough for consideration of a stem cell transplant. With documented progression of disease, it has become clear that would not happen.
He'll die soon. You look at him, his wife, and two year old daughter and wonder why. The idiomatic thought springs forth naturally, "What did he do to deserve this?" even if you're consciously able to say "this isn't his fault, he doesn't deserve any of this."
Maybe smoking is linked to lymphoma? Maybe not. And anyway, he never smoked. Even if he did, how many 30 year olds who smoke succumb to a similar fate? A tiny percentage. He occasionally drank alcohol, but never did any other drugs.
Maybe it's some other environmental exposure? Maybe he was exposed to something at work? He has worked at a facility that makes medical supplies. Hmm. No obviously known exposure risk.
There has to be something.
What drives the desire for an explanation? The answer to this question is complicated, but here's one factor that may drive the desire for many:
The just-world hypothesis.
People who strongly hold this hypothesis assume the world must be fair and may be more inclined to believe that if something bad happens to you, you must have deserved it somehow. This hypothesis sees suffering and concludes that people who suffer must be the kind of people we disdain. If the world isn't fair, what bad things might happen to me? If unfairness like this exists, it's scary to confront. One way to avoid this fear is to assume fault of the person who is suffering.
You know the patient cannot be blamed for his lymphoma. Maybe it can be explained by genetics, a quirk of cancer biology. But what about the 70 year old woman who has lung cancer after a 120 pack-year history of smoking cigarettes? There's no doubt about the relationship between smoking and lung cancer. The dangers of smoking continue to be clarified and every public health campaign that reduces smoking rates is a good thing.
Is the non-smoking blamer reassuring himself about his own fate? "That couldn't happen to me- I have never smoked." Tobacco contributed, no doubt. Can the blamer, armed with the just-world hypothesis, more easily ignore the fact that up to 24,000 people die in the United States from lung cancer every year without having smoked?
In an unfair world, try not to blame the dying person or try to dispute the person's experience of unfairness. The lifelong smoker may point to someone who lived twenty years longer while smoking. It's true that smoking is bad, people should stop for their health, and still some people skate through in spite of it. So it won't seem fair to many who don't.
Watch out for this bias. If you have feelings of blame (even if unspoken), examine what the source of those feelings might be for you. Be gentle with yourself if you discover it might be in response to fear of an unfairness which is universal in potentiality. Examine your own fears. Don't let them obstruct a compassionate response to the experience of loss and grief which is a source of the patient's experience of unfairness.
Aim to non-judgmentally provide safe passage and support to all until the end. The world will be more fair as a result.
*Any resemblance to real life patients is purely coincidental.
Photo: Justice via Shutterstock
Lyle Fettig is a palliative care doctor in Indianapolis where he lives with his wife and two boys, both who love Funky Bones at the IMA 100 Acre Park.
Monday, February 16, 2015 by Lyle Fettig, MD ·